- The EveryAware Project
- AirProbe International Challenge
- Open Source
In our latest post, we argued that a social network is NOT a wise crowd unless it comprises an efficient method to rate information and information sources in order to select good from bad user generated content. Well, it seems to be a hot topics: after Pachube, Ushahidi staff too is receiving comments on the difficulty of filtering bad (user generated) information from good one during a SwiftRiver deployment. This time, the staff replies with a rather technical post, explaining and graphically describing how users and content are validated by other users, with a redundancy that is hard to bypass, even for organized groups.
What would be absolutely possible is for a group to download Swift, set up their own instance with all sorts of fake information and publicize it as fact. However, our distributed, decentralized reputation system River ID would show that outside of that instances ‘ecosystem’ no one trusts those users, or the instance.
If you enjoyed this, please consider sharing it!
Tag CloudAirProbe International Challenge APIC Antwerp APIC Kassel APIC London APIC Turin awareness brussels CeBIT citizen science crowdsourcing crowdsourcing data validation environment EU events everyaware extreme citizen science fair Fukushima games geographical information geospatial information Germany Google Hannover health indignad@s internet internet and societies Marian Steinbach mobility muki haklay naples nuclear energy occupywallst openstreetmap opinion dynamics opinions paradiso participatory sensing press release publication publications radioactivity societies state of the map sustainability swiftriver UCL Uncategorized ushahidi waste web